NFLX · L5

Netflix

The Broader Market

The leading subscription streaming service; uses AI for recommendations and production.

watchConvergence

Six-Indicator Fragility Read

Valuation premium vs fundamentalsI1
47
AMBER (~42–52)
AI monetization gapI2
22
GREEN (~16–28)
Insider-Selling IntensityI3
45
AMBER (~40–50)
Operating leverage / margin durabilityI4
25
GREEN (~20–30)
Debt / cash flow sustainabilityI5
19
GREEN (~14–24)
Organic demand sustainabilityI6
51
AMBER (~46–56)

Verdict

{'verdict': 'No signals sit in the elevated band. Ranks 43rd of 68 on composite fragility (F\xa035.1), below ASML and Cisco.', 'as_of': '2026-07-11', 'source': 'engine-restatement (T1)', 'snapshot': {'composite_f': 35.1, 'n_elevated': 0, 'convergence': 'watch', 'rank': 43, 'elevated': []}}

Key Metrics

36
End-2025 P/E:
Verified sheet
30
Q1 2026 P/E:
Verified sheet
~25
June 2026 P/E:
Verified sheet
20
2022 trough P/E:
Verified sheet
Price · 50-session
$71.51 -24.3% · 50-session price series

Cross-Examination

Both Co-CEOs — Peters and Sarandos — sold stock on February 10–11, 2026 and again on May 5–7, 2026 with no 10b5-1 plan cited in the Form 4. Reed Hastings sold $184M on a long-running pre-planned schedule. The question isn't Hastings — it's why two sitting CEOs have $9.9M in combined discretionary sales in two synchronized clusters.

The sheet documents both clusters at the Form 4 level. The February cluster (Peters $2.3M + Neumann $752K + Hyman $464K + Willems $259K) occurred at ~$81–83/share. The May cluster (Sarandos $2.4M + Peters $2.4M + Neumann $823K + Hyman $504K) occurred at ~$87–89/share. No 10b5-1 plan footnote was confirmed in the Form 4 filings for any of these transactions. The sheet notes 'no major negative news release between these sell dates was confirmed' — but concurrent discretionary selling by the Co-CEO and CFO at two separate dates without filed pre-commitment is the signal the sheet scores AMBER on, not GREEN.

You say ads revenue exceeded $1.5B in FY2025, up 2.5x from the prior year. Show me where that number is in the 10-K.

It isn't. The sheet is explicit: the $1.5B FY2025 ads figure is 'call-stated; not broken out as a separate audited line in the 10-K.' Netflix does not report advertising revenue as a discrete line in any EDGAR filing. The only primary-source proxy is total streaming content obligations — not a revenue breakdown. The $1.5B figure cannot be verified from the 10-K.

Netflix stopped reporting paid memberships effective Q1 2025. The password-sharing crackdown benefit was Q2 2023 through Q4 2024. The timing is exact — crackdown runs, numbers look great, then the metric disappears. Coincidence?

The sheet documents the discontinuation: 'Netflix has stopped reporting memberships — a signal management views engagement/revenue metrics as the more relevant compass.' End Q4 2024 memberships were 301.6M (filed); end Q4 2025 is 325M (call-stated, no longer in quarterly filings). The bear case in the sheet names this directly: 'Stopping membership reporting makes AI narrative verification impossible.' The sheet does not resolve the question of whether the crackdown benefit has plateaued — it flags it as an unverifiable gap.